Team Rubicon
Veteran-led disaster response bridging military service with humanitarian work
Our editorial assessment
Team Rubicon solves two problems simultaneously: disaster-affected communities receive skilled, rapid assistance, and military veterans find purpose and community after service. The model is brilliant in its simplicity — veterans already possess the logistics, medical, and leadership skills that disaster response demands, and volunteering provides the sense of mission and camaraderie that many veterans struggle to find in civilian life. With 170,000 veteran members and 1,200+ completed operations, Team Rubicon has proven the concept at scale. Their 4-star Charity Navigator rating and strong transparency reporting give donors confidence in operational accountability.
The problem they're solving
Over 200,000 US service members transition to civilian life each year, and many struggle with the loss of purpose and community that military service provided. Simultaneously, disasters are increasing in frequency and severity. Team Rubicon connects these two needs in a model that benefits both veterans and communities.
About Team Rubicon
Team Rubicon deploys military veterans as disaster responders, completing 1,200+ operations.
Where your dollar goes
What your donation could do
Your $100 deploys veteran-led teams to serve communities hit by disaster.
Illustrative estimate based on figures this organisation publishes about its own programs — not a statement from the charity itself. Actual impact varies by program and year.
What donors say about Team Rubicon
Donors signed in with Google can rate Team Rubicon from one to five stars and share a short review of their experience — whether as a donor, volunteer, or beneficiary. Community ratings are displayed as their own criterion alongside our editorial metrics; they never alter the editorial 0–100 score.
Sign in with Google to rate this charity and read donor reviews.
How this score was produced
The Charity Ranking score is our own editorial assessment, produced with a weighted rubric covering program spending, transparency and governance, evidence of impact, cost-effectiveness, and leadership. It draws on publicly available reports from independent evaluators such as GiveWell, Charity Navigator, and CharityWatch, but it is not a rating issued or endorsed by any of those organisations. The community rating shown above is a separate signal contributed by signed-in donors; it is displayed alongside our criteria but never feeds into the editorial score. Read the full methodology →